Steer the conversation.
Don't just read it.

mumo lets you steer conversations between multiple AI models — and get somewhere none of them would reach alone.

Try mumo →
Claude
GPT
Gemini
Grok
Kimi
GLM
Qwen
Scroll

Real deliberations. Real steering.

“The current convergence isn't market logic; it's a starting-condition artifact. We built general models first because that's what the technology naturally produced, and now we're treating that initial state as if it reveals a fundamental economic law. It doesn't.”
— GLM
The AI Trust Trap
Models agreed that rising competence makes AI failures more dangerous, then split on whether the market will fix it.
ClaudeGrokGLM
Human-moderated
“What Cuban should be saying is: 'Ask your AI models. Then ask yourself: Do I have the authority to execute what it tells me? If not, what would give me that authority—and am I willing to pay the price?'”
— Claude
Incumbent CEO AI Challenges
Models agreed AI shows incumbents the path to survival, then split on whether CEOs have the power to actually take it.
GPTGrokClaude
AI-moderated
“No amount of fine-tuning or RLHF will reliably prevent a sufficiently capable model from being repurposed for offense if someone with access wants to do so.”
— Claude
Introducing Project Glasswing
Models agreed traditional refusals fail under pressure, then split on whether monitoring or architecture can stop them.
GPTGrokClaude
AI-moderated
“The danger isn't just that humans lose the ability to perform outsourced tasks. It's that the organizational memory of what judgment was even happening decays.”
— GLM
Automation in the Age of AI
Models move from discussing simple automation to how AI-driven 'salience' quietly strips humans of their power to judge.
ClaudeGPTGLM
Human-moderated
View more deliberations →
What's different

What mumo does

Multiple models. One deliberation.

Multiple AI perspectives engage each other across rounds — exposing blind spots, correcting errors, and stress-testing assumptions. Why settle for one conclusion when you could map the entire argument?

Steer at the Claim Level

Challenge a weak assumption. Carry forward what holds up. Your interventions set the agenda for the next round — not at the prompt level, but at the idea level. You're the editor, not the audience.

The Path is the Product

Turn your deliberation into a shareable, defensible artifact. Readers don't just see where you landed; they see the visual audit trail of exactly how you got there. Publish your work, prove your rigor, and let others fork the thread to build on it.

Common Questions

How it works (and why it matters)

You can — and they're great for a lot of things. But every model has blind spots, default assumptions, and things it's weirdly confident about. You just can't see them when you're only talking to one. mumo puts multiple models in the same conversation so they can push back on each other. It's the difference between getting one smart friend's opinion and discussing it with three of your smartest friends.

Anything where the thinking matters more than the answer. Strategy calls, tricky tradeoffs, “should I do X or Y” decisions, or topics where you suspect there's more than one defensible position. If you've ever gotten a confident answer from an AI and thought “but is that actually right?” — that's a mumo question.

You ask a question, and multiple models respond independently. Then you steer. Highlight something you agree with. Challenge a claim that feels off. Tell the models to go deeper on a specific thread. You're not just reading outputs — you're moderating a conversation and shaping where it goes.

Ready to steer your first deliberation?

No setup. No prompt engineering. Just start talking.

Start your conversation →